tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11942752.post112204200759382950..comments2023-10-26T10:17:54.935+01:00Comments on red mum: Apparently I haven't a clue... and this commentator has...Red Mumhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02471648634218431820noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11942752.post-1122232007758778202005-07-24T20:06:00.000+01:002005-07-24T20:06:00.000+01:00Fantastic insights here Mum- I am often shocked at...Fantastic insights here Mum- I am often shocked at the levels of personal info being sussed out by assorted bloggers on the internet. It is one thing to reveal that you have a child, provided you are not giving out your address or other telling details, but it is another matter entirely to publish photos of your child on the net. I have seen people post photos of children and their home in great detail, even exterior shots of the house that could easily be found if some sick shit wanted to. It's really sad but it's just a fact of life- you need to be vigilant in the protection of your children. This issue is not being addressed in the US of all places, where it should be paramount.Deliahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10321690290758802761noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11942752.post-1122229730941409502005-07-24T19:28:00.000+01:002005-07-24T19:28:00.000+01:00What a lucrative and very ugly pursuit this has re...What a lucrative and very ugly pursuit this has resulted in. It seems like the only innocents in this vile business is the poor children. It is their purity that potentially awaited being defiled. Thank heaven for the honoured intentions of those involved in highlighting the dangers of mixing children, photography and the internet. Well said Redmum spoken from a mother and teacher.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11942752.post-1122119649824967642005-07-23T12:54:00.000+01:002005-07-23T12:54:00.000+01:00We were talking about this last night and why didn...We were talking about this last night and why didnt she put suggestive pics of herself on the net, there are more than enough websites to cater for that!!!<BR/>And I am not suggesting at all that the pics she sent were dodgy, BUT they were pics of the children naked bathing, as it said in the news article, I am quite sure these would be classed as 'child erotica'.Red Mumhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02471648634218431820noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11942752.post-1122077733295665812005-07-23T01:15:00.000+01:002005-07-23T01:15:00.000+01:00dontcha just LOVE people who hide behind anon?Yeah...dontcha just LOVE people who hide behind anon?<BR/><BR/>Yeah, the Mother made a craptastic decision, and now she's paying for it by most bloggers calling her, at the very least, a blithering moron. I mean come on, if you're hard up for money, who in their right mind thinks that a picture of their kid will get much?<BR/><BR/>And most of us are creeped out by the adverts with children, ESPECIALLY diaper ads. Doesn't make what you did cool lady.<BR/>I'd much rather she'd have posted on a blog about her plight, and asked people for a dollar each. Look how much that one idiot got who admitted SHE ran up her debts buying shit!<BR/><BR/><BR/>argh....BRAINS ARE MORE THAN BALLAST PEOPLE!!!!thordorahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04162106158955358865noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11942752.post-1122052649501934092005-07-22T18:17:00.000+01:002005-07-22T18:17:00.000+01:00It's amazing how well learned in the General Natur...It's amazing how well learned in the General Nature of Everything these Anonymous commenters are without having the balls to put their name to their opinions...JL Paganohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00545313456435412626noreply@blogger.com